Coalitions give developing countries a stronger voice in the negotiations. The resulting agreements mean that all countries, including the most powerful, must abide by the rules. The rule of law replaces the right of power. As a result, the USMCA will not compensate for or reverse the massive devastation caused by the original nafta. Nor is the agreement a “model for future trade agreements.” The United States should freeze all trade negotiations until strategies and strategies to raise living standards, particularly for American workers, are put in place, as proposed by former EPI President Jeff Faux. Weak areas of agreement. If the areas of agreements are weak, we have little experience to do anything with the potential energy available. While we can see the potential as individuals and groups, our agreements make it difficult to work with this potential: we tend to focus more on the necessary results and much less on developing capacities and relationships or on vision and response to potential. To be responsible for the resilience of the group`s efforts in weak chords, we tend to increase resilience by increasing the flexibility of our ability to bring people to work – our resources for the human body. From this point of view, we must be able to increase and increase the number of human bodies available for work. If we need more production, we have more jobs, and if we need less, we have fewer jobs.

We can do this more effectively by ordering this group of workers for work – and keeping investments in their training and benefits low. As a result, we are focusing on the flexibility of financial capital in order to increase the number of contract positions available. Does the liquidity of this capital flexibility reduce the return on investment, as it must be more readily available? If the areas of agreements are able to use the potential energy available in the individuals present and in their interactions, the strong agreements seem to use our intention and attention – what we do, why and what we focus on – in a very different way from the weakness of the agreements. I`m curious to know what you`ll find in these two different settings. Strong areas of agreement. If the areas of agreement are strong, we have a great ability to identify by definition the potential energy available in our interactions.